首页> 外文OA文献 >Climatic cooling potential and building cooling demand savings: high resolution spatiotemporal analysis of direct ventilation and evaporative cooling for the Iberian Peninsula
【2h】

Climatic cooling potential and building cooling demand savings: high resolution spatiotemporal analysis of direct ventilation and evaporative cooling for the Iberian Peninsula

机译:气候制冷潜力和建筑制冷需求的节省:伊比利亚半岛直接通风和蒸发制冷的高分辨率时空分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the present study a new methodology allowing the assessment of building´s cooling demand savings by the use of ventilated passive cooling systems is presented in a twofold innovative way. Firstly, using a redefined concept of the climatic cooling potential (CCP), which allows for the direct estimation of savings in building´s cooling demand by the use of different passive cooling systems on a large spatiotemporal scale. Secondly, this assessment relies on high resolution climate dataset built using a regional climate model covering the Iberian Peninsula (IP) with a 9km horizontal spacing and the period between 1989 and 2008. Here, the CCP concept is applied for direct ventilation and evaporative cooling, in such a way that it allows for a comparison with the building monthly cooling demand, providing a direct assessment on the cooling demand savings for any building, for three air flow rates. The results show that CCP is asymmetrically distributed both spatially and temporally within the IP. During the cooling season CCP values are above 1kWh per m3 of building and 3kWh per m3 of building, for direct ventilation and evaporative cooling, respectively. Evaporative cooling provides a less heterogeneous annual cycle of CCP than direct ventilation, with a relative difference in the south and central part of the Iberian Peninsula superior to 100% during summer. Nonetheless, despite the consistently higher values offered by evaporative cooling, in the coastal regions the relative difference between the two systems drops to less than 10% due to the higher moisture in the air. For the case of a typical office room in the region of Lisbon, in the month of August, the cooling demand savings provided by the use of direct ventilation and evaporative cooling can represent more than 27% and 40% of the cooling demand, respectively.
机译:在本研究中,以一种创新的方式提出了一种新方法,该方法可以通过使用通风的被动式冷却系统评估建筑物的冷却需求节省量。首先,使用重新定义的气候制冷潜能(CCP)概念,通过在较大的时空规模上使用不同的被动制冷系统,可以直接估算建筑物的制冷需求节省量。其次,此评估依赖于高分辨率气候数据集,该数据集是使用覆盖伊比利亚半岛(IP)的区域气候模型构建而成的,该模型具有9公里的水平间距以及1989年至2008年之间的时间段。此处,CCP概念用于直接通风和蒸发冷却,可以与建筑物的每月制冷需求进行比较,从而直接评估任何建筑物在三种空气流量下的制冷需求节省量。结果表明,CCP在IP中在空间和时间上都是不对称分布的。在冷却季节,对于直接通风和蒸发式冷却,CCP值分别高于每立方米建筑物1kWh和每立方米3kWh。与直接通风相比,蒸发冷却提供的CCP年度周期异质性较小,夏季伊比利亚半岛南部和中部的相对差异超过100%。尽管如此,尽管蒸发冷却提供的值始终较高,但在沿海地区,由于空气中的水分含量较高,两个系统之间的相对差异降至10%以下。对于里斯本地区典型的办公房来说,在8月份,通过使用直接通风和蒸发式制冷所节省的制冷需求分别可以占制冷需求的27%和40%以上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号